Similar to the working alliance, the perceived quality of the real relationship was related to using more methods to prepare the patients to the transition (r = .18, p < .05) and perceived positive patient experience (r = .24, p < .01). Age, years of clinical experience, number of patients seen weekly before the pandemic, previous video therapy experience, and views of video therapy before the pandemic were not associated with the perceived quality of alliance or the real relationship in online sessions.
Elite notice-question and stress
On average, therapists experienced professional self-doubt sometimes or frequently (M = 2.41, SD = .67, range: 1.11–4.78) in video therapy during the pandemic, which is higher than the level of self-doubt experienced by therapists in a prior naturalistic study of PSD (Nissen-Lie et al., 2013 ; t(136) = , p < .0001), but still on the lower end of the 5-point Likert scale. Therapists felt less competent (M = 2.28, SD = .52, range: 1.00–3.00) and less confident (M = 2.15, SD = .56, range: 1.00–3.00) about their professional skills during online compared to in-person sessions. Higher levels of reported professional self-doubt were related to several demographic variables, such as younger age (r = ?.34, p < .001), less clinical experience (r = ?.33, p < .001), and worse perceived patient experience (r = ?.36, p < .001).
Therapists’ anxiety about using video therapy was moderate (M = 2.87, S.D. = .86, range: 1.00–4.83). Similar to professional self-doubt, higher anxiety was associated with female gender (t(137) = 3.24, p < .05), younger age (r = ?.30, p < .001), less clinical experience (r = ?.36, p < .001), smaller number of patients before the pandemic (r = ?.18, p < .05), no previous experience with video therapy (t(138) = 3.63, p < .001), not being licensed yet (t(136) = 3.28, p < .001), perceiving patients as having a negative video therapy experience (r = .27, p < .001).
Overall in our sample, therapists reported somewhat positive attitudes towards video therapy (M = 3.42, SD = 0.50, range: 2.31–4.69). Although their views about video therapy had become more positive since the start of the pandemic (t(140) = 2.06, p < .05); they still thought that video therapy was somewhat less effective compared to in-person therapy (M = 2.19, SD = 0.65, range: 1.00–4.00).
Therapists who held more positive attitudes towards video therapy tended to have previous experience with video therapy (t(142) = 3.53, p < .05) and to have positive perceptions of their patients' online experience (r = .30, p < .001). Higher rated working alliance and real relationship were associated with more positive attitudes towards video therapy (r = ?.34, p < .001 and r = ?.40, p < .001, respectively) whereas professional self-doubt was associated with more negative attitudes (r = ?.34, p < .001).
The sample of therapists as a whole was undecided as to whether they would like to continue using video therapy in the future (i.e. expressed a neutral response on the UTUAT Behavior Intention subscale), with large differences among therapists (M = 3.14, SD = 1.23, range: 1.00–5.00). Therapists who intended to use video therapy in the future were more likely to have prior Chula Vista local hookup experience with video therapy (t(138) = 2.91, p < .01), and tended to have positive perceptions of their patients' online experience (r = .32, p < .001).
Come across Dining table 1 for an overview of this new correlations involving the standard measures. The brand new relational, professional and you can tech-associated scales were synchronised from the questioned advice. Specifically, ratings toward real relationship and working alliance was indeed absolutely coordinated, and top-notch worry about-doubt and you may nervousness was in fact undoubtedly regarding one another but adversely toward stated doing work alliance and you may actual relationships, indicating one to practitioners with lower levels out of elite group self-question and you can anxiety reported a stronger functioning alliance and actual dating due to their on line patients in pandemic. The brand new attitudes towards the and purpose to make use of clips therapy on the future was basically positively of recommendations of your operating alliance, and you can actual matchmaking, and you may adversely connected with top-notch worry about-question and you will nervousness (pick Table step one).
In the present mix-sectional questionnaire research, we aimed to understand more about therapists’ skills away from video medication switching of in-individual videos coaching in pandemic. Significantly more specifically, i checked out: 1) Therapist perceptions of your own therapeutic relationships (performing alliance and you will real relationship) inside the videos instructions as compared to earlier in the day inside-individual medication; 2) Counselor rely on inside elite proficiency (elite self-doubt) and you can experienced nervousness linked to taking video clips procedures; 3) Therapist perceptions with the video cures technical in general, also intentions to continue using movies treatment in the upcoming.
On expose decide to try, the inner feel guess is actually Cronbach’s ? = .86. To evaluate this new experienced improvement in the real dating since change to films cures, another items try added: “Compared to inside the-individual training, in my own on the web coaching this new healing matchmaking experienced … ” to-be replied on the a good around three-point Likert scale (step one = a great deal more real compared to-people, 2 = a comparable, step 3 = quicker genuine than in-person).
Overall performance
Women reported higher working alliance in online sessions compared to men (t(137) = 2.18, p < .05), licensed practitioners reported higher alliance score than trainees (t(136) = 2.33, p < .05), and practitioners in North America (USA and Canada) compared to those in Europe (t(137) = 2.08, p < .05). Within the sample, higher online alliance was also reported by those who used a greater variety of methods (as opposed to fewer methods) to prepare patients for the transition (r = .26, p < .01), and those who perceived their patients' experience with video therapy more positively (as opposed to less positively) (r = .32, p < .001).